Transplant dilemma is the legal difficulties or organ dilemma?
Brother unfortunately got uremia, need for kidney, the medical examination certificate of four of his sister in a line with the heart patient conditions, however, the younger sister is a genetically disabled. This year at the age of 34 TaoYongLi, 2005 car accident, lost his a kidney, later had uremia. Now a week dialysis twice, a dialysis I yuan. Dialysis was much too expensive, the difficult to support the family. So, TaoYongLi father chose to help son in the kidney, February this year, the old man asked four daughter and son TaoYongLi do heart patient. The results showed that sister TaoXiaoGong conform and brother do the organ transplant operation conditions. Hope at the family to chip in. However, a more difficult problem NBA Hats in front of a whole family. The only change of the kidney and brother sister TaoXiaoGong, suffering from congenital retarded. According to our country "the human organ transplant regulations stipulated in article 8, donate organs citizen shall have full capacity for civil conduct. TaoXiaoGong belong to without person of civil action competence, and therefore can not as a donor. The hospital refused to this brother and sister both do a kidney transplant surgery. Can't change kidney, the son can only start dialysis, father ask around flexible way, and even take out the relevant departments prescribed him according to proof that his daughter is TaoXiaoGong legal guardian. Hoping to relent allows him to replace daughter in the family, for elder brother "donate" kidney. However, according to law, the court can't support his request. Congenital mentally retarded TaoXiaoGong 32 years old, is a little brother to look after big, although she to the home things seem don't quite understand, but occasionally, she also can speak of the condition of the elder brother to confusion. To face legal regulation, TaoYongLi family here almost said, as a younger sister, to bring home the pillar TaoYongLi do change kidney surgery, is part of the natural order of things. However, the law does not allow. Lawyer told us, in very behind law is the biggest human feelings, security is in the best interest of the people. Donors do not have completely ability, is can't judge the risk. It is like a normal person, in his own, without knowing was forced by the other organs, this kind of behavior no matter what purpose, can cheap oakley sunglasses not be legal recognition. Organs, especially live organ is undoubtedly a scarce resource, the behind of the interests of the huge space, if the law allows without person of civil action competence in specific cases can be donated, so great benefits temptation in front, someone will desperate, the result is very terrible consequences is difficult to control, so not allowed without person of civil action competence contributions is legitimate, also accord with the fundamental value of the society ruled by law.